کریستوفر اسپی وی :
خانواده سلطنتی بریتانیا, شیطانی است! ملکه انگلیس با ستمگرها, سوسیالیستها و مهای جنسی و بچه بازها چای می نوشد!
Monsters Inc: The Satanic British Royal Family - Christopher Spivey
سایت کریستوفر اسپی وی از سوی دولت دیکتاتوری انگلیس مسدود شده بود که گویا با تلاش دمکراتهای انگلیس, صفحه ی سایت او بازگشایی شده است. او طی مدت مسدود شدن سایت خود در صفحه نخست سایت, به دولت و سلطنت انگلیس لعنت FUCK YOU فرستاده بود. تا زمان مسدود شدن سایت کریستوفر اسپی وی, دولت و سلطنت دیکتاتوری و فاشیستی انگلیس سایت کریستوفر را به یک سایت دیگر هدایت می نمودند که سایت او از مشاهدات و جستجوی کاربران پنهان گردد؛ اما اکنون در تاریخ 24 فروردین 1397 شمسی و بازدید از سایت او, شاهد رفع انسداد از سایت اسپی وی شده ام که مطالب بسیار مهمی درباره مفاسد بزرگ دولت و سلطنت انگلیس را منتشر کرده است. لینک آدرس سایت او در سطور پایین تر ثبت شده است.
منابع خبری کشور کانادا که هنوز هم جزو مستعمرات انگلستان محسوب می شود به بحران مالی در انگلیس و ارتباط آن با خاندان سلطنتی این کشور پرداخته و نوشته اند : کاهش هزینه های دولتی ، افزایش مالیات ها و کاهش کمک های مالی به دانشجویان در سال گذشته میلادی موجب برپایی تظاهرات اعتراض آمیز گسترده در سرتاسر انگلیس شد و این تظاهرات ها به نوعی وجهه انگلیس را در اذهان عمومی جهان خدشه دار کرد.
در همین ارتباط خانواده سلطنتی انگلیس سال گذشته برای برگزاری مراسم عروسی پرنس ویلیامز نوه ملکه و همسر وی بیش از پنج میلیارد پوند هزینه کرد و به دلیل همین اعتراض شدید مردم انگلیس را برانگیخت. تا پیش از سال 2002 ملکه انگلیس سالیانه از محل دریافت مالیات های مردمی 122 میلیون پوند درآمد داشت و از این مبلغ برای هزینه های درباری و خانواده سلطنتی استفاده می کرد اما وی مجبور شد در سال مالی 2010 – 2011 تنها از 51 میلیون پوند برای مخارج خود و خاندان سلطنتی انگلیس استفاده کند و قرار ا ست درآمد ملکه در سال آینده بار دیگر کاهش یابد . از سوی دیگر افشای رسوایی جنسی خانواده سلطنتی انگلیس به خبر اول رسانه های این کشور طی ماههای گذشته تبدیل شد. در همین زمینه منابع خبری گزارش داده اند پرنسس دایانا ، زمانی که عضوی از خانواده سلطنتی بوده مورد آزار و اذیت قرار گرفته است! این جمله کوتاه کافی است تا بزرگ ترین جنجال رسانه ای سال در خصوص کشوری اتفاق بیفتد که خود را مهد آزادی و دموکراسی می داند اما در آن حتی بالاترین مقام های سلطنتی نیز از آزادی های حیوانی در امان نیستند . رومه های چاپ لندن در گزارش هایی در خصوص رسوایی جنسی خانواده سلطنتی که فاش شده است نوشتند : اعضای خانواده سلطنتی و افراد مشهور، این روزها در مورد حق حفظ حریم خصوصی خود زیاد صحبت می کنند اما چرا ما نباید در مورد زندگی خصوصی آنها و آنچه در این قسمت از زندگیشان می گذرد چیزی بدانیم؟ در پی رسوایی هک کردن تلفن و زیر سؤال رفتن فرهنگ شغلی، عملکرد و اخلاق مطبوعات انگلیس، این امر تقریبا تبدیل به نوعی تابو شده که کسی بخواهد اینگونه استدلال کند که به هرحال نوعی علاقۀ جمعی و مشروع به نوشتن و خواندن در مورد زندگی خصوصی افراد مشهور در بین مردم وجود دارد.
رومه های انگلیسی نوشتند البته قصد آن نیست که از اقدامات هکرهای تلفن دفاع کنیم و یا از رفتار کسانی که پرنسس دایانا را مورد آزار و اذیت قرار داده اند. اما می خواهیم بگوییم که این موضوع کاملا قابل فهم، قابل قبول و قابل دفاع است که خبرنگاری به دنبال کسب اطلاعات و نوشتن در باره کارها و برنامه های غیر رسمی اعضای خانوادۀ سلطنتی باشد کارهائی که در اوقات فراغت و خارج از مسئولیت های رسمی شان انجام می دهند. این رومه ها اضافه کردند : البته وسواس و حساسیت ما نسبت به رویال ها ( اعضای خانوادۀ سلطنتی انگلیس) چیز جدیدی نیست. در طول قرن ها نشیب و فراز های زیادی دربین بوده ، اما اگر به عنوان مثال؛ به دوران سلطنت چار دوم برگردید می توانید اسناد رسوایی معاشقه های پادشاه را با معشوقه های فراوانش پیدا کنید.در اوایل دهۀ1970 و اواخردهۀ 1990، احترام به سلطنت تا حد زیادی افول کرد. اما امروز رویال ها سواربر ابرها در آسمان سیر می کنند. خبرنگار رومه انگلیسی " دیلی میل " که به افشا کننده راز پرنسس دایانا معروف بوده می نویسد : به طور کلی، روابط بین مطبوعات و کاخ سلطنتی یک رابطۀ دو سر سود است، هر چند گه گاه یکی از طرفین دست بالا را می گیرد و سود بیشتری می برد و در حال حاضر، متاسفانه، این خانواده سلطنتی است که این امتیاز را در اختیار دارد ، در حالی که رسانه ها عقب مانده اند.
هم اکنون برخی مستند سازان قصد دارند 60 سال حاکمیت ملکه الیزابت دوم و فراز و نشیبهای زندگی وی و خاندان سلطنتی انگلیس، ت داخلی و خارجی این کشور طی این مدت از جمله تغییرات در مستعمرات و روی آوردن به استعمار نو، اعطای استقلال به مستعمرات سابق، جنگ عراق و افغانستان، تهای نرم ملکه الیزابت برای تاثیرگذاری بر دولتهای مختلف حزب محافظه کار و کارگر در تاریخ معاصر انگلیس و استفاده از مکانیزمهای غیرشفاف برای حداکثرسازی نقش خاندان سلطنتی در روندهای تصمیم گیری و پرهیز جدی از مداخله آشکار در مسائل ی را بررسی و به تصویر بکشند. مسلما بخشی از این تلاش ها معطوف به فساد گسترده در خاندان سلطنتی و تلاش ملکه برای سرپوش گذاشتن بر این فسادها و نیز تلاش وی برای تغییر نگاه مردم به این خاندان، تقویت زمینه ادامه نظام سلطنتی مشروطه در انگلیس و ممالک تابعه و چالشهای مربوط به تعیین یک پادشاهی با ظاهری مقبول برای آینده این کشور خواهد بود. به اعتقاد اکثر تاریخ نگاران بریتانیا از گذشته دور با مشکلی به نام خاندان سلطنتی و سیطره آن بر تمامی ابعاد زندگی مردم این جزیره مواجه بوده؛ خاندانی که از همان روزهای آغازین تا امروز با فساد و انحراف اخلاقی رابطه ای ناگسستنی داشته است. سابقه فساد اخلاقی خاندان سلطنت بریتانیا به بیش از 100 سال می رسد و گهگاه به آگاهی افکار عمومی نیز می رسد، مثلا ادوارد هفتم در سال 1870، آلوده روابط نامشروع بود و همگان از فساد جرج پنجم و روابط ضد اخلاقی اش آگاه بودند. روابط عاشقانه متعدد ادوارد هفتم که در سال ۱۹۰۱ به سلطنت رسید، همواره باعث رنجش ملکه می شد، اما در نهایت وی با شاهزاده الکساندرا از دانمارک وصلت کرد که این ازدواج برخلاف تصور همه تا سال‌های زیادی دوام آورد. در سال 1891 میلادی، پسر ادوارد پنجم که با دو زن بدکاره رابطه و مکاتبه داشت، ناچار شد به آنان باج دهد تا بتواند نامه هایش را پس بگیرد و ماجرا را پایان دهد اما شماری از نامه های این فسادها بعدها در حراجی های انگلیس به فروش رفت. در دوران معاصر، شاهزاده مارگارت، خواهر ملکه الیزابت دوم؛ ابتدا با یک خلبان انگلیسی رابطه داشت اما چون دولت و کلیسا با ازدواج شاهزاده با یک مرد مطلقه مخالفت کردند، با یک عکاس ازدواج کرد. مارگارت پس از مدت کوتاهی طلاق گرفت و تا آخر عمر با مردان فراوانی رابطه داشت. در سال 2005 میلادی نیز رسانه های انگلیس گزارش دادند یک همجنس باز که با پسر مارگارت رابطه جنسی داشته، تقاضای باج کرده تا نوار مربوط به این رسوایی را منتشر نکند.
براساس اسناد موجود، شاهزاده چار، ولیعهد انگلیس، با این که با ن فراوانی رابطه داشت، در سال 1981 با شاهزاده دایانا ازدواج کرد و با داشتن دو پسر، در سال 1996 طلاق گرفت. به گفته دایانا، در طول زندگی مشترک، چار با "کاملیا پارکر" که در آن زمان شوهر داشت، رابطه نامشروع داشت. چار در سال 2005 میلادی ، با کاملیا ازدواج کرد و دایانا نیز به همراه دوست پسرش که فرزند یک میلیاردر مصری بود در یک تصادف در پاریس درگذشت. جدایی چار از دایانا ضربه محمکی به وجهه خاندان سلطنتی بریتانیا وارد کرد. کوتاه مدتی پس از آن درز مکالمات تلفنی چار با کامیا پارکر، معشوقه چندین ساله‌اش، به رومه‌ها سر و صدای زیادی را به راه انداخت و موجب شد که بسیاری از مردم چندان رغبتی برای به سلطنت رسیدن شاهزاده چار نداشته باشند. در سال ۲۰۰۳ پاول برل، خدمتکار شخصی دایانا، کتابی منتشر کرد و در آن پرده از بحران زندگی شویی چار و دایانا برداشت. شاهزاده اندرو، دومین پسر و سومین فرزند ملکه الیزابت دوم، در سال 1986 با "سارا فرگوسن" ازدواج کرد و بعدا از وی طلاق گرفت. روابط کاری شاهزاده اندرو با جفری اپستین، میلیاردر آمریکایی، افشا و موجب بی آبرویی خاندان سلطنتی شد زیرا شریک شاهزاده اندرو، به جرم تعرض جنسی به کودکان، در آمریکا تحت پیگرد است. سال ۱۹۹۲ سال چندان خوشی برای خاندان سلطنتی بریتانیا نبود. در ماه مارس اندرو از همسرش سارا فرگوسن جدا شد. چند ماه پس از جدایی عکسهایی نیمه از سارا فرگوسن به همراه مشاور مالی اش در کنار یک استخر به رومه ها راه یافت. و در ماه دسامبر شاهزاده چار و دایانا پس از سالها اختلاف جدایی خود را رسما اعلام کردند. ملکه الیزابت دوم این سال را که همزمان با چهلمین سالگرد تاجگذاری اش بود "سالی بد" لقب داد. ادوارد، سومین پسر و چهارمین فرزند ملکه انگلیس است که ازدواج کرده و دارای دو دختر است. پیش از ازدواج وی با سوفی رایز- جونز در سال 1999 میلادی، شایعاتی منتشر شد مبنی بر این که شاهزاده انگلیسی، در خفا همجنس باز است اما این صفت خود را بروز نمی دهد. هری، نوه ملکه الیزابت، به دلیل روابط عاشقانه متعددش با ن، حضور در مهمانیهای متعدد و انتشار عکسهایی از او در حالت مستی، لقب "شاهزاده مهمانی" را از رسانه ها دریافت کرد. انتشار عکسی از او در یونیفورم نازیها نیز تا مدتها خبرساز بود. این مسایل تنها گوشه از واقعیت ها و حقایق تلخی است که تاکنون به جهان خبر درز کرده و انتظار می رود با ادامه آشکار شدن رسوایی های مالی و اخلاقی خاندان سلطنتی بریتانیا مردم این جزیره در آینده با سرافکندگی خود را انگلیسی معرفی کنند.
منبع گزارش : سیر نیوز
ترجمه متن عکس : ها . شما فقیر هستید !
!Christopher Spivey : The Satanic British Royal Family
Personally I would seriously question the morals of a Queen who takes tea with tyrants and socialises with offenders and paedophiles.
کریستوفر اسپی وی : خانواده سلطنتی بریتانیا, شیطانی است! ملکه انگلیس با ستمگرها و
سوسیالیستها و مان جنسی و بچه بازها چای می نوشد!
سایت کریستوفر اسپی وی از سوی دولت دیکتاتوری انگلیس مسدود شده بود که گویا با تلاش دمکراتهای انگلیس, صفحه ی سایت او بازگشایی شده است. او طی مدت مسدود شدن سایت خود در صفحه نخست سایت, به دولت و سلطنت انگلیس لعنت FUCK YOU فرستاده بود. تا زمان مسدود شدن سایت کریستوفر اسپی وی, دولت و سلطنت دیکتاتوری و فاشیستی انگلیس سایت کریستوفر را به یک سایت دیگر هدایت می نمودند که سایت او از مشاهدات و جستجوی کاربران پنهان گردد؛ اما اکنون در تاریخ 24 فروردین 1397 شمسی و بازدید از سایت او, شاهد رفع انسداد از سایت اسپی وی میباشم که مطالب بسیار مهمی درباره مفاسد بزرگ دولت و سلطنت انگلیس را به زبان انگلیسی منتشر کرده است.
لینک سایت کریستوفر اسپی وی
We were involved in and spoke at the UK Rally Against Child Abuse in Trafalgar Square last Saturday (7 Aug 2010). Filmmaker and child abuse survivor Bill Maloney opened the Rally with a rousing speech in which he committed treason under Nelson’s column declaring that the Queen Mother was a paedophile. Diana had apparently declared to a close friend that she was evil. Her footman, who had previously been a butler to the Queen, was a convicted child offender who used to groom his victims by taking them to parties with the Queen Mother at Clarence House” – Spokes person for UKRACA
With the Queens Jubilee celebrations still dominating the news it’s probably a bit unfair to try and gauge whether the Royal family are gaining or losing public support. After all, some of those who wouldn’t normally support the Queen but are easily led – of whom there are many – often get caught up in the inevitable wave of patriotism that an event such as QE2’s 60 years on the throne is bound to generate.
For what it’s worth, those who are pro monarchy tend to put the country’s support for Liz at around 80%. On the other hand, those in favour of Britain becoming a republic are more likely to site the result of a recent major poll undertaken which came back as showing support for the Queen as now being less than 50%.
To my way of thinking, even 50% support is far too high. There is a wealth of easily accessible information available as to how evil, corrupt, greedy and parasitic this woman and her family of inbreeds are, yet at least 1 in 2 of us are happy to let her reign continue…
Are these people mad?
The Queen should have been hanged for High Treason back in 1972 when she let the corrupt paedophile Prime Minister, Edward Heath sign away our sovereignty. She had and still has the authority to do so, yet she still let him. Furthermore, she let him do so under very unfavourable terms for the country- Terms which Heath had in fact been blackmailed into agreeing too.
This blackmail came about after it was discovered that Heath was molesting young boys from various children’s care homes around the country. The following is an extract from ‘Wheel Of Fortune’ written by T Stokes:
One of those who stood most to lose was Sir Edward Heath prime minister from 1970-74, who was known to visit the Jersey care home the Haute Garrene among others to take young boys on boating weekends on his yacht called ‘Morning Cloud’, or as bodyguards referred to it, ‘Morning Sickness’.”
Heath had already been warned several times by the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police about his conduct, but like so many before him, The then Prime Minister thought that he was untouchable and as such, ignored the warnings
Many of these boys were allegedly provided to Heath and many more prominent MP’s for that matter by the Radio 1 DJ and TV Celebrity Jimmy Saville.
Course, Jimmy ‘rattle, rattle’ Saville was a hero to millions of kids in the 1960’s & 70’s who would never believe that of him. After his career took a nose dive in the 1980’s Saville reinvented himself as a Charity fund raiser for the Stoke Mandeville Hospital and as such millions more would also never believe him capable of such a heinous crime.
On the other hand, I find it extremely easy to believe and very plausible too. After all, he was extremely flamboyant, he never married – in fact he was never known to have had a girlfriend. But most tellingly of all was his fondness for children, especially boys in care homes. The following is an extract in connection with the Haut de la Garenne inquiry into the child abuse that took place at the Haute Garenne Childrens home on Jersey :
A source spoke to one of his victims and he said about others who were present, and more important, who was supplying the children to him. The person bringing children for him to abuse was Sir Jimmy Saville. He was seen by the witness, victim, taking young boys onboard Heaths yacht the ‘morning cloud’ when they were at party conference. Saville is known for supplying a number of high profile MP’s with children for them to ually abuse”.
Saville, a homoual paedophile, was also a frequent visitor to the Royal household. You can draw your own conclusions from that but I will remind you that during these 6oth anniversary celebrations, one of the invited guests on the Royal Barge was the convicted offender Harbinder Singh Rana who served a 4yr prison term for a list of offences including 5 counts of indecent assault.
The fact that all of the senior royals were in the company of this known offender – who would have been closely vetted before being allowed anywhere near them – would not have mattered a jot to Liz & Co. After all, the Royal family have been linked to perverse scandals for centuries.
Prince Andrew for instance has been dogged for years by rumours of homouality. If he is, fair enough, but he would never be allowed to admit it, what with his Mother being the head of the Church of England. However, the nature of his ual preferences was called in to question following the revelation of his close association and friendship with the child offender Jeffrey Epstein. Now if you or I were known to be regular visitors to a Paedophiles home we would be attacked and beaten in the street.
Unfortunately, Randy Andy also thinks nothing of charging the public for the travel costs to his shenanigans. Now considering the fact that he is well aware that the tax payer should only pick up the tab for his travel to and from ‘Official business’ trips, the word ‘Fraud’ automatically springs to mind.
Course, if asked which member of the Royal family is Gay, the majority of people automatically choose Prince Ed the Ball. Now while it’s true that he wasn’t man enough for the Military and as such tried a career as a ‘luvie’, there are no scandal stories to support the claim. In fact, apart from trading in on his Royal status and beating his dogs with a walking stick, there is actually very little tittle tattle on Rock steady Eddie… He’s just a pratt.
His older Brother Prince Big Ears… Sorry, that was rude so I will start again. Edwards’s older brother Prince Dobby, sometimes affectionately known as Charles, on the other hand is also rumoured to be Gay, or at least biual. This information came straight from the horse’s mouth so to speak. That isn’t to say that the info came from Princess Anne. I will deal with her later.
Prince Charles uality was called into question following the murder of his wife Diana. Diana, in a self preservation exercise had made a tape recording of one of Charles’ valets telling of how he was raped by a senior member of the Royal Household. Jamie Doward, social affairs editor at the Observer ran this story on November 2, 2003:
Secret confessional videos made by Diana, Princess of Wales – which would have caused huge embarrassment to the royal family if they had been made public – have been [allegedly] destroyed.
Royal sources say the videos, recorded by a former BBC cameraman, who is now believed to be living abroad, were seized when detectives raided the home of Paul Burrell, Diana’s former butler, in Cheshire two years ago.
The videos featured an emotional Diana discussing her life following her divorce from Prince Charles and an allegation that a courtier close to a senior royal raped one of his male colleagues [apparently Princess Charles sodomized one of his male valets].
This is the same allegation that Diana reputedly recorded on the infamous audio tape whose whereabouts is now the subject of a media frenzy.
On the audio tape the princess recorded George Smith, a former aide to Charles, alleging that he was [homoually] raped [sodomized, buggered”] by a senior courtier [apparently Princess Charles, who partially admitted the allegation by stating that he was the person named in Diana’s diaries, without going so far as confessing his guilt that he perped the crime]”.
Never the less, despite the evidence pointing to Charles being a Homoual Rapist – A common and accepted practice amongst the Elites apparently – at least he and his Sister Anne can be reasonable sure of their parentage. On the other hand Prince’s Randy Andy & Ed the Ball cannot claim likewise with the same degree of certainty.
This is because despite appearances, The Queen and her husband, Phil the Greek (who is in fact German) are not as close as they would have you believe. There are in fact far to many Newspaper articles and rumours pertaining to Liz & Phil’s cold, loveless marriage, for them not to be true.
Prince Andrew’s parentage was called into question shortly after his birth and the murmurings have gained momentum ever since by sly digs in the media such as this one from the Telegraph:
There are those who persist in believing that Prince Andrew’s natural father was the Queen’s racing manager, Henry Porchester, Porchey”, 7th Earl of Carnarvon, suggesting the conception occurred at some point between 20 January and 30 April 1959 when Philip was away on another of his long sea voyages in the Britannia”.
In 1993 The New York Times Magazine exposed the Queen’s penchant for sleeping with her underlings in an article quoting the columnist Nigel Dempster telling the author Christopher Hitchens, ‘Get hold of a picture of Prince Andrew and then one of Lord Porchester at the same age. You’ll see that Prince Philip could never have been Andy’s father’.
Tellingly, The Queen did not dare challenge the article. She did however use the tax payer’s money to increase the budget for the Buckingham Palace Press Office – the outfit set up decades ago to buy the silence of media owners and editors.
Coincidentally enough, or perhaps as fate would have it, as I was searching for a photograph of the Queen and Lord Porchester in each others company, I came across an article in today’s Telegraph newspaper (6/7/12) from which the following extract is taken:
Euston headed the list of well-born flirts” that Elizabeth and her friends used to joke about, which also included Lords Porchester and Plunket, among others. Unlike her fun-loving younger sister, Margaret, Elizabeth was painfully shy and cautious and solemn in her demeanour, albeit still attractive. At parties she could appear something of a wallflower. However, at nightclubs – such as the 400 Club in Leicester Square, where there was a band for dancing, or the nearby Café de Paris, before it was bombed – she could be squired by young men she liked, away from prying eyes.
She clearly found Hugh Euston, Porchey [Lord Porchester] and Lord Plunket ually attractive,” recalled a lady-in-waiting to the Telegraph journalist and author Graham Turner, and they would get the come-hither looks, a fluttering of the eyelashes. You can’t have much going on between you in a Viennese waltz, but there’s the look, the pressure of the hand and, in those days, it wasn’t so commonplace to want the next thing.”
Moreover, according to royal researcher Jim Hutchinson, State Papers released in 2009 confirm that in 1959, the [pregnant] Queen and the question as to who her – as yet unborn – baby’s father was likely to be, was discussed in Cabinet on three occasions. The details of the first of these discussions had been stamped ‘Not to be seen for 50 years’. That is 20 years longer than the standard 30 year rule. The details of the other two discussions have been stamped ‘Not to be seen for 100 years’.
Four years after Randy Andy’s birth, Prince Ed the Ball was born and just like his older brother, it wasn’t long before his parentage became gossip for the press. However, in Edwards’s case the man being touted as his Father wasn’t the womanising Lord Porchester, it was in fact a chap named Baron Patrick Plunkett.
While the evidence for Pluckett being Edwards Father isn’t as compelling as that for Porchester being Prince Andrew’s Father, it would tie in with the much repeated claim that after the birth of Princess Anne, Bizzy Lizzy refused to have Phillip in her bed.
This claim was repeated in a book written by Nicholas Davies and revealed a shocking world of royal adultery, passion and betrayal”
The book stated – as fact, not surmise – that the Duke of Edinburgh’s liaisons with his cousin, Princess Alexandra and the film star Merle Oberon, not to mention his former Daughter in Laws mother, Susan Barrantes (among others!)- as the reason why the Queen banned her husband from her bed”.
More damming still, the Telegraph reported in an article on the 5th of September 2004, about how Phillip had sat impassively, incensed but silent” when a Journalist from a Sunday broadsheet” had suggested to the Duke that he might have a raft of illegitimate children and had enjoyed a homoual liaison with Valery Giscard d’Estaing, the former President of France.
Course, Prince Dobby – being a chip off the proverbial old block – is known to have had the odd extra marital affair or two. It has been well documented that he was sleeping with Camilla Parker Bowles throughout his entire marriage to Princess Diana. However, what is less well known is that while still married to Diana and sleeping with Camilla, Charlie boy was also getting it on with his son’s Nanny, Tiggy Legge-Bourke.
After Princess Diana’s death, it was revealed that she had deposited a letter with her solicitor, Lord Victor Mishcon, stating that Charles planned to have her killed in a Car accident” so as he would be free to marry Tiggy” ( Tiggy Legge-Bourke). When the letter had first been made public, the name of the woman Charles wished to marry had been censored. This led to the general consensus amongst the British population being that the woman in question was Camilla. However, as you can see from the photo of the letter(below), Diana states that Camilla was just a decoy.
Moreover, further details of the sordid affair were revealed at the Diana inquest in 2007. The Daily Mirror had this to say on the matter:
Princess Diana told her solicitor that both she and Camilla Parker Bowles were going to be got rid of” so Prince Charles could marry Royal nanny Tiggy Legge-Bourke, her inquest heard”.
It is a known fact that a ‘Car accident’ is a recognized way of carrying out an assassination. The method of doing so is called the ‘Boston Brakes’. It is also a fact that 6 weeks before Diana was murdered, Camilla Parker Bowles was in a serious road accident while driving alone. Despite knowing that it is a very serious criminal offence to flee the scene of an accident, Camilla immediately ran into the nearby woods from where she then phoned Prince Charles, who immediately had his security team rush and get her. She later said that she was in fear of her life – A curious thing to say.
I do intend to cover this car accident in more detail in a future article surrounding the murder of Diana.
In November 1995 the National press were tipped off that Tiggy Legge-Bourke (TLB) had become pregnant by Charles and had had an abortion. It was further reported that ‘words’ had been exchanged between Diana and Legge-Bourke on the subject at a party on the 14th of December 1995, where Diana had supposedly said to TLB; So sorry about the baby”.
On 18 December 1995, Legge-Bourke, with the Queen’s agreement, instructed the libel lawyer Peter Carter-Ruck to write to Diana’s solicitors demanding an apology and asking that the accusation be recognized to be totally untrue.
Predictably no apology or retraction was ever received, but Legge-Bourke’s lawyers never the less circulated a letter to the news media to warn against publication.
Staying on the subject of illegitimate Royal offspring, there have always been rumours flying around suggesting that Dobby isn’t actually the real father of his 2nd son, Prince Harry. Certainly, as is the case with Dobby’s younger brother Andrew, there is a lack of the usually predominant Mountbatten (Battenberg/Windsor) facial features present when you look at Harry.
It isn’t in fact, unfair to suggest that Harry does indeed share many more characteristics in common with those of his alleged father, James Hewitt than he does with Charles. Award winning Journalist, Ian Halperin had this to say on the matter:
A longtime employee of Harry’s mother Princess Diana told IUC that the Royal Family was involved in a massive cover up to hide the fact that Diana’s ex lover James Hewitt is in fact Harry’s real father. According to the source Prince Philip threatened Hewitt’s life if he didn’t go along with the cover up. They made him lie about the timeline,” the source told IUC. Prince Philip told Hewitt he would destroy him if it ever leaked out. It’s impossible that Charles is Harry’s real father. Hewitt was on the scene as Diana’s lover two years before Harry was born. Diana stopped having with Charles years before Harry was born. Harry looks exactly like Hewitt”.
So there we have both the Queen’s husband who is all but King in name and his son, the King in waiting, both having evidence against them to suggest that they both indulged in multiple affairs while married. Both were closet homouals – Charles being an alleged homoual rapist. Both impregnated with child, women other than their wives and both play father to children who may not be their biological children. Do they not say that history repeats itself? It certainly seems to be the case in the House of Windsor, but could it get any worse?
It most certainly does because while Dobby was carrying on his love affair with Camilla Parker Bowles, his Sister Princess Dobbin AKA Anne had resumed her love affair with Camilla’s Husband, Andrew Parker Bowles.
The Daily Mail newspaper had this to say on the matter on June the 19th 2010. I have underlined certain words in order to put emphasis on certain insinuations:
It’s been 37 years since their red-hot affair ended in tears when the young cavalry officer called a halt to their romps, announcing he was going to marry a girl called Camilla.
Anne, shattered at the loss of her one true love, got hitched on the rebound to another cavalryman, Mark Phillips, before finding contentment of sorts with ‘harmless’ naval officer Tim Laurence.
Since then, between their four collective marriages, Anne and Andrew have often rekindled the flame.
Anne is 59 and Andrew 70 – but despite their advancing years, the talk round Royal enclosure this week focused on a report that their on-off affair was on again”.
Now, as far as I am aware, Anne and her husband ‘Dim Tim’ haven’t announced their separation. Therefore, a person would be entitled to ask; Is there no end to this dysfunctional family’s bed-hopping?
Apparently not. The Royal Researcher Jim Hutchinson has this to say in relation to Princess Dobbin and her Daughter Zara Phillips, who is obviously the Granddaughter to the Queen:
Zara is the daughter of Princess Anne and Peter Cross, a detective of the Royal Protection Squad. When Princess Anne told Mummy she was pregnant Cross was moved to an ordinary police job in South London. But ‘the Royal and her Dick affair’ carried on (and on – much to the delight of MI5). The Queen’s spooks reported the couple spending steamy nights in a workers cottage on Anne’s Gatcombe Park estate, Gloucester. Mummy was not amused”.
The Daily Mail Newspaper however were slightly more restrained than Mr Hutchinson. They had this to say on the affair which, as you will see, also reveals that Dobbin’s husband at the time, Captain Mark Phillips had also got in on the royal trend of having illegitimate children:
For some years before they parted, she [Anne] and Mark Phillips were not really happy.
As he flew around the world riding and teaching (and siring an illegitimate child in New Zealand, whose mother eventually came looking for maintenance), there was talk and innuendo about Anne and the men (Note the insinuation, ‘men’ being the plural – Spivey) close to her.
Much of it involved Detective Sergeant Peter Cross, a married officer from Mitcham, South-West London, who became her protection officer in 1979.
A year later, Anne came down to breakfast at Gatcombe Park to find grim-faced Royal Protection Squad senior officers waiting to meet her. Cross was being relieved of his duties amid suggestions that he and the Princess had become ‘too close’.
Never was the Princess’s imperious manner as useful as when rebutting such suggestions.
The formerly high-flying Cross found himself back in uniform, but moved from the glamour of royal protection to a mundane role behind a desk at Croydon police station.
Alas, that wasn’t the end of the matter because four years later, in 1984, handsome Sergeant Cross (by then retired) sold his kiss-and-tell story to the News Of The World.
They paid him £600,000 – worth about £2million in today’s money – in exchange for which he claimed the Princess snuggled up to him on the sofa while watching TV at Gatcombe, had intimate meetings in the library and in a lodge on the estate, the changing rooms of a swimming pool at Windsor and even a rendezvous in a three-bedroom semi in Ewell, Surrey, loaned to them for the afternoon by a fellow officer.
درباره این سایت